The first P of being a PM

The idea for this series of posts stemmed from a completely different discussion I had with a colleague on the differences between product management and program management. I won’t delve into that but what got my mind racing was me trying to introspect on a product manager’s role. After running through a whole host of responsibilities and attributes, I finally narrowed it down on Prioritization. I believe this is the first and foremost task a product manager has to be responsible for. I did cover this briefly in my introductory post of my first month as a Product Manager. 

Why is prioritization important?
As a product manager, you are measured against metrics related to your user’s goals. These metrics could range from Gross Margin Value (GMV) to Average Order Value (AOV) to Engagement (DAUs, Cohorts) and so on. There is absolutely no room for anything else if your features/releases aren’t impacting the metrics the most. It’s the holy grail. Intercom published a really informative read on prioritization. They subscribe to a model called the RICE framework — Reach, Impact, Confidence and Effort. Each of these parameters are scored and the overall RICE score determines the priority of a feature. Honestly, it cannot get simpler than this. But I personally also like to leave some room for judgement and intuition as well. What follows from prioritization is the product roadmap. 

Roadmap vs Ad hoc Requests
A product roadmap is created after you are done prioritizing tasks and features/releases. Depending on the stage of your company, you may have a roadmap for a quarter, a year or possibly even more than that. I’ve only worked for small to medium sized startups so my product roadmaps haven’t gone beyond 6 months. I believe that once you’ve gotten the items in your roadmap prioritized, half your job is done. But wait…

…and just when you’re mid-way feeling good about your roadmap going on as planned, someone from the marketing team makes a feature-request. Someone from Finance asks for alterations in certain dashboards. Long story short, it’s a balancing act between handling ad hoc requests and ensuring you’re still on course with the roadmap. On receiving an ad hoc request, I ask myself (and the stakeholder) these high-level questions:

  1. What is the impact on my user and the aforementioned metrics?
  2. Can I measure this impact? Short term gain or long term gain?
  3. How much of a pain point is it to the stakeholder/user? 
  4. Can I quantify or measure the pain point or criticality of #3? 
  5. Can it be resolved or shipped with a complementary feature which is already in the product roadmap?
  6. What is the effort (quantified by time) involved? 

There are more questions but I’ll stick to the above six. Based on these, I take a hard call on whether to pursue ad hoc requests at that time or post-pone working on it or shoot it down all together. 

What certainly helps is organizing your engineering team into developers who can work on long term features and shorter term features separately. I have seen this through experience as I’ve faced resource crunch working with small teams of about 5–6 developers. I may have groups of 2 or 3 developers working on the big ticket items which typically have a development effort of more than 1-2 weeks. On the side, I will reserve one developer who will work on relatively smaller features (development effort of ~3 days or less). If you can draw up a mental picture of a Gantt chart, you will realize that I am constantly shipping small features and/or bug fixes on a regular basis without having the major chunk of my roadmap affected. In light of this segregation of resource, I would then assign the ad hoc requests (post scrutinizing on whether to take them up, of course) to the developer working on short term features. In the worst case scenario, I would be able to get to those ad-hoc requests in a few days. There you have it, my approach on handling a roadmap with ad hoc requests. (Vincent’s secret sauce much?)

Dealing with stake-holders
By nature of the PM role, you will be dealing with multiple stakeholders and inevitably, everyone wants their requests as soon as possible. To be specific, I’m talking about internal stakeholders of the company such as marketing, finance, sales, operations and others. Prioritization becomes important more than any where else. As I had described earlier, there will be times you have to shoot down proposals or feature requests by nature of failing the ad hoc test. I wish there was a surefire way of coming out with a win-win outcome. It’s subjective and depends on the context of the discussion. I have learnt though, that being empathetic with your fellow peers is a step in the right direction. Back up your reasons with data, guesstimates or strong hypothesis to ensure that your stance defensible. Without these, it’s all about people management skills. On the flip side, do take into account that these stakeholders are equally important to you and the success of your product roadmap. One such example would be at the time of product launch, you’d have to coordinate with the sales and marketing teams to conduct demos with customers/sales representatives. I guess you get my drift, right? Product managers need to develop people skills to handle such situations. 

If there was a punk rock song about product management, it would be ‘Prioritization Über Alles which translates to ‘prioritization above everything else’. It determines the success or failure of your product. 

Stay tune for the next post — The second P of being a PM.

Best of 2016

It's that time of the year again where I list down my favorite metal albums of 2016. This is a practice that I've been following over the past two years (Czech out the 2015 and 2014 lists). 2016 started off weak with very few releases catching my fancy. But fortunately, the latter part of the year dazzled me with some stellar releases. Traditional heavy metal ruled the roost for me and newcomer bands like Eternal Champion and Sumerlands got multiple plays. There were also some off-kilter releases from Khonsu and Mithras. Overall, the list below is representative of the different genres in metal. Without further ado, I'll dive into them one by one. 

 

10. Khonsu - The Xun Protectorate
Khonsu's sophomore album might fly under the radar for many but let's give them the attention they deserve. The band hails from Bergen (Norway) and their sound can be best described as industrial/progressive metal with a healthy dose of black metal injected in it, making it sound fairly evil. Khonsu is very accessible and for all I know, they may appeal to the Gojira/Ministry fan as well. The sci-fi theme, really detailed artwork, blast beats overlaying industrial sounds and stomping choruses, all make it a grandiose record.

9. Ripper - Experiment of Existence
Ripper from Chile play death/thrash in the vein of early Sepultura and Possessed. The production on the album does justice to the 80s sound and I'm most pleased about that. The second most satisfying thing to hear on the album is the bass. Ripper have paid adequate attention to the bass, as if they are the garnishing atop the onslaught of riffs. This young band will go far! 

8. Blood Incantation - Starspawn
Starspawn is the only pure death metal styled album that caught my fancy this year. Blood Incantation do riffs excellently and by Jove, will the riffs hit you hard! The band primarily lies in the intersection of old school death metal and tech-death sound. On a side note, the more you listen to this album, the more you will appreciate the song arrangements and the good use of atmospheric passages (which build up to full fledged songs). 

7. Mithras - On Strange Loops
Mithras make a triumphant return with an album after 9 years and it did not disappoint at all. Sure, I could rank it higher but I was severely biased towards other sub-genres. Attempting to classify On Strange Loops would be a task carried out in vain but nonetheless here goes nothing. While the foundation of the album is laid in tech-death, Mithras have also created modern-sounding atmsopheric and progressive elements in their songs. It took a while to appreciate the album but when I was able to, it was very satisfying. 

6. Thrawsunblat - Metachthonia
I can't recall many melodic/folk black metal albums that have made an impact on me in the past couple of years. Well, Thrawsunblat have certainly done so with Metachthonia. The album meets all the expectations one might have before listening to songs in this genre. There is never a dull moment while listening to this, which only exemplifies the excellent songwriting. Vocals alternate appropriately between clean and harsh. There are acoustic-foresty snippets which add fresh and new dimensions to the songs. The catchy melodies will get your head bobbing in no time. The album clocks in close to an hour and at the end of it, you'll probably tell yourself that this band needs to keep going to make many more such albums!

5. Mare Cognitum - Luminiferous Aether
Mare Cognitum is the brainchild of Jacob Buczarski, who has been unrelenting with his project's releases year after year. While Luminiferous Aether may not be his best work, this album does carry on in the same vein as his previous albums; Dripping in cosmic themes, lots of tremolo-picked riffery while at the same time creating that warm characteristic black metal atmosphere. The album serves as excellent background music as well as one to be discerned with scrutiny. 

4. Eternal Champion - The Armor of Ire
We're moving into traditional heavy metal territory now. This piqued my interest because of a Manowar-like album cover. Eternal Champion is a name taken from an epic fantasy Multiverse novel series by Michael Moorcock. Naturally, the lyrical themes do justice to that. As far as the musicality is concerned, the band plays traditional heavy metal with some first wave traditional doom-laden parts too. It's a great debut full length release for the band, although I would've liked to hear more anthemic memorable choruses in this. 

3. Vektor - Terminal Redux
Enter the mad scientists of who thrash as much as they prog! This has probably been one of my most anticipated albums of 2016 and they delivered an album which sounds as fresh today as it will many years down the line. The songs, much a characteristic to Vektor's style of writing, are long and winding. This needs repeat listens to gain an appreciation of the intricate layering put forth in this record. Terminal Redux is easily the best thrash album of the year. 

2. Khemmis - Hunted
Khemmis is the only doom band on my list. But it rightfully earns this position because of a stellar sophomore album. While I did say 'doom', many of the songs delve into heavy metal and stoner rock territories. I think what won me over is the vocals - clean, soaring and somewhat reminiscent of Solstice (UK band). Another aspect of Khemmis that I really liked was the variation. Doom bands can get caught in the rut with monotonous songs but not Khemmis. They switched it up a bit with galloping tunes like Three Gates. Almost sounded like the band High On Fire and before you know it, they were back to their epic doom parts. The guitar work (riffs and solos) is top-notch on Hunted.  

1. Sumerlands - Sumerlands
So it came as a massive surprise to me that the two guitarists from Eternal Champion play for Sumerlands too. The other surprise was seeing Phil Swanson, of Hour of 13 fame, do vocals here. For lack of a better word, Sumerlands' debut is a very complete album. This is heavy metal at its finest and I think Phil's voice suits this kind of music brilliantly. I can liken his vocals to early Black Sabbath. With each of the 8 songs averaging at around the 4 minute mark, it's fairly easy to get through the album in no time. There's no fluff. Sumerlands packs as much as they can into those minutes, while giving each song a different treatment. The quality of music spreads across all songs evenly (if there's such a thing like that) and that's my main criteria for ranking Sumerlands numero uno. So give this album a spin and enjoy riding its glorious riffs!

Traction: A Startup Guide to Getting Customers

It's book review time. Since its release, Traction has become a fairly popular book, often recommended to start-up founders, aspiring entrepreneurs and anyone who is keen on growing a business exponentially. After having spent a significant time in early-stage ventures, I decided to give this book a shot to see if it resonated strongly with me. 

Traction starts off by emphasizing greatly on a method they call the 'Bullseye Framework'. True to its name, it is a process which involves narrowing down on that ONE channel which will give you the most traction initially. This may seem very intuitive but you'll be surprised how many companies get that wrong. In summary, the 'Bullseye Framework' requires you to brainstorm on all possible traction channels, rank them on the basis of potential, run quick tests for hypothesis testing and then finally focus on that identified channel.  As you progress through the book, you'll realize how central this process is for companies (as shown in the examples) in identifying their first channel.

With that as the crux of the book, the authors go on by enlisting 19 different traction channels that have worked for companies across industries. There is a dedicated chapter to each of those 19 traction channels. Some of the obvious traction channels mentioned are SEM, SEO, Display ads and Public Relations. Some of the not-so-obvious traction channels listed in the book are Engineering as Marketing, Community building and Viral Marketing (yup!). Each of those chapters outline the how-to, benefits and impact of the said traction channel. What adds further value are real world examples. One such example is about Mint, a website which helps users with managing finances. On starting up, the company had a goal of signing up 100,000 users in 6 months. By following the Bullseye Framework, Mint realized they could target personal blogs as their first traction channel. This led to 20,000 users signing up even before the official launch of their full-fledged product. Crazy, right? Once the company realized they were exhausting blogs and weren't seeing a spike in growth, they resorted to Public Relations as a channel. This eventually led the company to signing up 1 million users during their first 6 months. 

What I love about this book is that it appeals to both the layman as well as the seasoned marketer. Unlike many "management" books, Traction does not faff about. There's no jargon, no worldly business advice, no bullshit. The book stresses upon a simple framework, emphasizes on hustling hard by rigorously testing traction channels and repeating the process in case of failure. The book also talks about the importance of dividing your time between traction and product development.

Traction is a short read but I can see myself getting back to it whenever I have to ponder upon any of the traction channels mentioned here. If it were up to me, I'd prescribe this book as essential reading for all business school students because this is as real as it gets.

You can buy the book here.

Hairklutz (#tbt)

I find haircuts liberating. On the occasion of having a haircut today and it being #throwbackthursday, I thought I should revive this old blog post (circa December 2008) of mine. In this, I express an interest in going bald and wrote about a barber who refused to cut my hair short. Pretty random, yes. I'm also not correcting some obviously glaring typos that I now see. Read on. 


Brimming with new found enthusiasm, I dashed off to a nearby salon. I had revived the long lost feeling of wanting to go bald. This feeling first overcame my rational-thinking about two years back. It was more about succumbing to peer pressure at that time because a couple of my close friends and I had made a pact to remove every strand of hair from our heads. What became of that pact? Well I chickened out. I had to, for I realized I actually had a lot going on and I just couldn’t let some foolish pact destroy me. Until that point of time, I was maintaining an untarnished reputation of a (deceptively) simple bloke; I was interning at a reputed company and something like a shiny bald head had the potential to raise eyebrows and who knows it could’ve well caused a furore in that conservative environment.

This time it was different. I couldn’t care less. I know I won’t be subjected to a before-and-after scrutiny by any acquaintance of mine, because quite frankly I know no one here. On that positive note and with a brimful cup of enthusiasm, I dashed off to a nearby salon.

I found the barber in a pensive mood. He probably hadn’t had a customer all day. With the ol’ wave-of-the-hand-in-front-of-the-face, I got his attention and the cutting of hair got underway. As opposed to how the biblical Samson felt about haircuts, I’ve always felt it was in a way, metaphorically speaking, self liberating as it injected new life into me while getting rid of excess baggage. This time though, I was going for full self-liberation!

I directed the barber to use the machine and shave off everything. Paying little attention to what I had said, he flexed his fingers and crackled his wrist joints and finally spoke, “It won’t look good on you, sir”. “But this is how I want it”, I demanded. Again, casually chewing his paan he proceeded to trim the sides of my head without paying any heed to what I had to say. I was flummoxed. My calm disposition prevented me from leaving the place promptly and I somehow consoled myself with the thoughts of telling him to trim it all off when he’d reach the top of my head.

The scissors slowly meandered around my head, cut a micrometer of hair with each stroke and paused. The barber would then take a moment to analyze his work and with an artistic gleam in his eye, he’d proceed to slash another couple of micrometers. What Monsieur Van Gogh (ha!) didn’t realize was that he spent close to twenty-five minutes only on the sides of my head. Maybe it was his intention to do so while slowly and tastefully culminating to the top or maybe he was just bored. That seems perfectly fine if you are a, dare I say, connoisseur and an appreciator of fine (hair-)art. I’m not and my plans of getting a brisk haircut were thwarted by this fool of a person. I had to put a stop to this madness. “The sides are quite short…that’s fine. Now cut the top as short as you’ve cut the sides.” That sure told him right?! He nodded in agreement but the moment I mentioned, “…use the machine”, he was taken aback and disapprovingly said, “It’ll be very short. It won’t look good. I’ll use the kenchi and give you a nice slope-cut”. At this point of time, I was convinced that he wasn’t going to be able to do what I asked. I gave up point blank and ended up getting just another haircut. I could smell victory in his faint humming. Bastard.

Somehow I can’t get over the barber’s unwillingness to use the machine and do as I wanted. Maybe it’s just me, but I suspect that he actually enjoys his job and that a machine-shave would probably have just destroyed the simple joys of doing everything by hand. He even took his own sweet time and I can only guess that he was savoring each stroke and each blissful sound of the ‘kenchi’ going ‘ka-chissh’.

Who knew that a stupid tale like this would have certain undertones suggesting something so essential in today’s world like job satisfaction?  Silly as it is, it’s made me realize that following the herd and landing up with something average is a big NO for me. So if you’ll please excuse me, I’ll go brainstorm my plans for 2009.